Everyone has heard the expression “the only people that win in family law cases are the lawyers”. Although these lawyers also lose sleep, hair, and their sanity, the parties involved usually lose all the same things, with a financial burden on top. Going through the Court process is very time consuming. There are no quick hearings. A typical case will go through a first appearance, a Case Conference, a Settlement Conference, and a Trial Management Conference before it is set down for a trial. This does not include any motions that may come up and the endless paperwork to prepare for and attend each event. Additionally, there are numerous calls, emails, and meetings in between. It can take several years for a hearing to go to trial. All these things are extremely costly, and your legal bills will rack up faster than your cart at Walmart. Luckily, there are several alternatives to litigation that may be better suited for your case.
Mediation is a popular and effective alternative to going to court. Mediation involves a neutral third party, called a mediator, who helps the parties involved in the dispute to reach a mutually agreeable resolution. Unlike court proceedings, mediation is a voluntary process that allows both parties to have a say in the outcome. It is a confidential and private setting where open communication and cooperation are encouraged. Mediation is especially beneficial in family law cases because it promotes better communication and helps to preserve important relationships, such as those between parents and children. It also tends to be less adversarial and more cost-effective than traditional litigation.
In arbitration, a neutral third party, known as an arbitrator, is chosen to listen to both sides of the dispute and make a binding decision. Unlike mediation, where the parties work together to find a mutually agreeable solution, arbitration allows for a more formal process that resembles a courtroom setting. It can be especially beneficial in cases where the parties cannot come to a resolution on their own and need someone to make a final decision. While arbitration is not as flexible as mediation, it provides a faster and more streamlined process compared to traditional litigation. It also offers privacy and confidentiality, allowing the parties to keep their personal matters out of the public eye.
4-Way settlement meeting
In this process, both parties, along with their respective lawyers, come together to negotiate a settlement agreement. These meetings provide an opportunity for open discussion and brainstorming to reach a mutually satisfactory outcome. The presence of lawyers ensures that legal rights and obligations are taken into consideration throughout the negotiations. This collaborative approach allows for creative problem-solving and empowers the parties involved to have more control over the outcome. By actively participating in the settlement process, individuals can avoid the uncertainty and emotional toll of going to court while still achieving a fair resolution.
Choosing non-court options for family law resolutions offers numerous benefits. Firstly, these alternatives save time, money, and minimize conflict compared to a lengthy court battle. They provide a more peaceful path to resolution, allowing parties to maintain important relationships, such as those between parents and children. Additionally, non-court options like mediation, arbitration, and 4-way settlement meetings, offer more control over the outcome and promote open communication and cooperation. They also provide privacy and confidentiality, ensuring personal matters remain out of the public eye. By choosing these alternatives, families can navigate their challenges in a more efficient, cost-effective, and collaborative manner.
Written by Irina Kochkina